My Poetic exclamations and other expressions



What am I?

Perhaps the greatest question to be answered is: What am I? Not who, not where, but What. Saying, I am human, or mammal, just requires more definition, the greatest personal answer is when you no longer have to keep defining. I am a collection of tiny pieces, all put together to form a whole, and that whole has an energy I call a soul, or spirit, or consciousness. I am my atoms, and their building blocks are connected, throughout space and time, entangled either directly or indirectly, to all others, especially the galactic centers, where light is often diverged from the gravitational pull and tearing at/near the event horizon. there are photons in black holes that are frozen in time, whilst their entangled counterparts whiz all across the universe, and when those photons encounter something, they instantaneously transfer information to the black hole. Perhaps a black hole could be considered a timeless consciousness… if there are enough particles gathered together, why not? we are just atoms all bound together… It is perfectly logical to say that “I am not conscious” as it is true, each piece is not, however, at some point, those individual pieces hit a criticality, and consciousness is achieved  and only a full stopping of the physical process stops it, or does it? After all, energy is neither created nor destroyed, so where does that energy go? if we are to count the universe as “All”, then like consciousness, considering the number of pieces, which could be called “Not”, means that the pieces are more than the whole, meaning that which is contained within is greater than the sum of its parts. Synergy is when the sum of the parts is greater than the whole, Fractal, lacking a better term (perhaps a vocabulary issue) means the whole is less than the sum of parts. which means that there is a huge potentiality for structure within the boundaries of such a system. If you can have such a system where the pieces are more than the sum (again, lacking a good vocabulary for description) then the capability for structure, especially self similar ones, is nearly unlimited, holding an Infinity in the palm of your hand, like a Serpinski Square, or perhaps things like the Mandlebrot Set can show some of the boundaries. After all, it is the pieces that escape the boundary levels that make all the beauty… continued another day…

#RandomRamblings of a scientist-poet-theist but not deist…

Light Emits Time

if light is a self sustaining cyclic phenomenon (electric and magnetic fields operating transversely, thereby each generating the other) which by most  definitions it is, and it is quantized into full unit values, i.e. entire wavelength units, then it makes sense to  me that light (henceforth referred  to as photon) would  emit time. as the wave formation accelerates, and produces itself, it must art some point hit the cosmic speed limit c. in my mind this happens at the midpoint of the wave formation, which means that the  2nd half of  the wave, or in relative to the first part, the negative phase,would be going faster than, thereby causing the 2nd part to run backwards in time. As the 2nd part  runs its length, it must dissipate this energy, and taken as a whole, it would be symmetrical. however, as it runs continuously, something must give, and to  my mind, instead of ALL time being relative, the base time must be emitted by photons. Lacking specific language, I hope this basic description works. for a more direct-from-my-mind explanation, the 2nd part returning to the first makes a fuzzy particle, containing its own time, and its own corpuscular qualities, but as it has effectively no time of its own, it can split, maintaining the wavelike qualities, and even the double slit experiment, as the 2 pieces can go through at slightly different times, as long as the net sum is 0 and the time is then emitted. detecting is another strange quality, and I think the quantum leap has something here. As a  photon approaches an electron, the inherent fuzziness of the electron, and the temporal fuzziness of the photon converge, the energy if traveling backwards in time (should be fairly large for a small piece) would be shared with the electron, imparting a distinct time sharing between the two (in an idealized notion of 1 photon to 1 electron) the frequency determines the color, but the time shared allows for the instantaneous (to outside observer) movement with no resulting change in momentum. When the electron releases the photon when dropping to the lower energy level, the time shared should be equal to the amount of time needed for the photon to accelerate to c.  Photon emission is the cosmic timekeeper, even  in the big bang (though I am a cyclical model fan, I will, for the moment concede that this version is separate enough from previous gravitational cycles to be considered unitary) once enough random fluctuations even in the singularity had occurred for an photon cycle to start, it would begin  to emanate time, thereby continuing itself, as that  happened,  time and space are self-created.  Or at least our 4 dimensional notion (again, for convenience sake, I like to think of time as different, thereby truly giving us pi-dimensions, and a grand total in M-theory of  4pi  dimensions) as time is what broke gravity’s hold on the singularity, it could  be somewhat considered as an anti-gravity, at least for M-theory. If time is something relative to light, light emits time, and time can be considered to have  an inherent energy of its own, possibly equal to the einsteinian energy of a non-mass particle traveling  faster than light, then the equations should balance, perhaps working the energy of change through the quantum leap as a baseline for estimating?

P.S. – this an idea I  have had without language for many years, and one I have been able to express this way for most of this year, please excuse my tardiness in publishing, I am new at this .

UPDATE: I have enrolled in some classes for the other universal language,  Math. I believe there must bbe a better reason for a lack of angular momentum than just uncertainty.  Anyway, thank you everything for the help

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: